Pages

THE SQUASH JOINT

Are you addicted to squash?



Monday, July 30, 2012

THE HASHIM FILES - PART 5

Okay. Hashim now starts to talk shop. As expected he starts where the base of many problems stem from – the grip. After all, if you are not holding the racquet correctly, how can you expect to hit correctly? When starting to learn the sport, it is important to take lessons straight away. It is a lot more difficult to establish the correct grip and technique if you have been playing for some length of time and have developed bad habits. I have coached many people who not only hold the racquet incorrectly but have insisted they do not want to change. It’s too uncomfortable and awkward. I know it isn’t easy – nothing is when learning this sport! Holding a racquet the wrong way will affect your power, your accuracy and consistency, your length... the list goes on. I can’t force anyone to do anything, but these people are limiting themselves on how far they can take their squash game.

I am often asked if pros actually change the grip during a match. Although it is preached that changing the grip is a sin, pros do actually change the way they hold the racquet in certain situations – but not the form. They may shorten the grip (hold the racquet higher up the handle) if they find themselves deep in the back corner and have little room to swing the racquet, or open up the grip (open up the racquet face more) in order to get more slice / cut on the ball. This happens naturally with the pros and takes much experience to master. For now, I recommend you stick to the basics. Get the grip right. Go from there.





To see all the blog articles on Hashim, go to: The Hasim Files  

Wednesday, July 25, 2012

NO ‘LET’, AND THAT’S FINAL!

Joe McManus and his PST (Pro Squash Tour) machine are at it again. Addressing controversial issues head-on and implementing rules in the attempt to squash the problem. (Pun obviously intended.) It has been almost 3 months since the DAC hosted their second World Championship, and still I get members approaching me hopeful that we repeat the event in 2013.

The tournament is a popular topic of conversation. For those who witnessed it first hand, spent personal time with Joe, the players, and the small PST crew, they cannot say enough positive things about it. I can do all the advertising and marketing in the world, but nothing beats the word-of-mouth.

The ‘no-let’ rule won our members over. The debate about how successful the rule is rages on amongst the squash purists and this article isn’t here to add to it. What I will say is that after talking to Derek Aguirre from the Detroit urban squash program “Racquet Up! Detroit” – RUD -, the group of kids he brought along to watch the semi finals were ‘blown away’ by not just the show PST put on (the music, the interviews, the interaction with the players), but also by the intensity of the matches and the infrequent amount of ‘let’ calls. PST gained a handful of young fans that day.

A big part of RUD teachings is behavior. On and off the court. It is basically a zero tolerance. Every single child from the RUD program I have met has been incredibly polite with perfect manners. One of Derek’s fears of taking the kids to pro tournaments is to have them witness player dissent on court. The arguing, the gesturing, the rudeness, is not an image he wants the kids exposed to. They look up to the pro players and want to emulate them. They are sponges and see and hear everything.

During our event at the DAC, player behavior was very good overall. Not perfect, as we did have the sporadic quarrel pop up now and then, but certainly not cringe worthy either. However, it seems that you cannot have one tournament these days go through without some type of player-referee incident. This isn’t (or wasn’t) just a PSA problem – PST has had its spattering of confrontations too. Nothing more infamous than the conduct game awarded against John White for arguing last season during the final of the Albany Open against Bradley Ball that cost him the match.

Now, with the new rule implemented by PST, arguing with the referee will almost be eliminated completely. (I say ‘almost’ because I am sure that in the heat of the moment, some will not be able to help themselves.) There is now a ‘zero tolerance policy regarding dissent’ in all PST tournaments. No more arguing, no more whining, no more wasting time in discussion with the referees. Accept the decision and move on. Or be penalized.

So is this good for the game? I know that some people love to watch players meltdown, go ballistic, throw tantrums, and carry on like five year olds. Watching someone make a complete moron of themselves makes us feel better about ourselves. We point fingers and snicker under our breath. (It’s probably why reality television is so popular!) What would baseball be without the occasional manager blowing a gasket at the umpires and getting tossed from the game? It makes all the highlight reels when it happens.

Another blogger wrote that he had never been to a match where the conduct of the players detracted from the quality of the squash, or he felt he couldn’t bring his own kids to watch. I cannot argue with his opinion, but I certainly cannot say the same thing. I have seen a multitude of matches where the altercations made me wince and feel embarrassed as a fellow squash professional. You see arguments between players and referees all the time. And why? Because even though the referees have the power to stop it immediately, they simply do not have the spine to do so. They allow the ‘talk-back’ to continue and players push the envelope often to the point of becoming downright rude and disrespectful.

Squash has no place for that. I have no problems if a player asks a referee why a certain decision was given in order for that player to adjust in future situations. But once the explanation is given, that’s it; it’s time to move on. PST has taken this step for one main reason and it’s not for the players. PST wants to be confident that if I invite RUD kids to watch, a member is accompanied by his family, or I bring my young daughter to a match, they will not be subjected to misbehavior. If professionals want to be treated as professionals, then they should act accordingly. Respect the game, the referee, the club, the sponsors, and most importantly - the spectators.

Here is the memo sent out to all the PST players regarding this rule: PST Memo
Do you like the new rule?

Tuesday, July 24, 2012

SUMMER DREAMS

Summer League Finals~~

I applaud the commitment! This is exactly how the league should be played – with every single player turning up! All of the bonus points were collected, with the exception of one due to a sub, and the result was rightfully decided on the court. They were tough matches. They were close matches. And for “Nightmare on Madison Street”, they were dream results.

Last week, I predicted a win for “Boast-Busters”, and that once again turned into the kiss of death. Not even Patrick Petz’s Irish luck was enough to stop the impressive winning streak of their opponents. It was looking good for a while however, when after the first 2 results came in, “Boast-Busters” took both of them 2-1. Nick Scavone kept his season’s undefeated record alive beating Dave Simmet and Elliot Shafer was strong in his victory over Todd Baker.

Then experience took over for “Nightmare on Madison Street”. Tom Fabbri seems to be getting hungrier by the day and adores feeding off younger rivals. His victim yesterday was Josh Slominski, who has been struggling of late, but Tom wasn’t about to let up and he powered to a 3-0 win. Manny Tancer followed that up as he won the battle of the undefeated number ones taking down the unpredictable styling of Robin Basil 2-1.

Andrew Spohn's win
sealed the deal

Joe Moran steadied the ship for “Boast-Busters” with a 2-1 win over Greg Davis, but it was countered with Al Iafrate getting the better of Patrick Petz also 2-1, and the writing was on the wall. “Boast-Busters” needed to take the final 2 matches of the day to have any chance. Last week’s hero Brian Schrage once again found himself under pressure in a must win situation. This time against Andrew Spohn – who beat Brian 2-1 in their last meeting. Second time around was not a charm for Brian as he went down 3-0, and with that “Boast-Busters” were out of reach. The final match of the evening played anyway and Drew Van Tongeren slopped the icing on “Nightmare on Madison Street’s” cake with a tough 2-1 triumph over Brittany Paquette (subbing for Steve Murphy).

Congratulations to the winners – commiserations to the finalists. And a huge round of applause to all competitors for making this the most active summer league season yet! Now it’s time to enjoy the summer break – leagues start up again in October – but that doesn’t mean you should stop playing! Box ladders are still running, and you have 2 months to work on your game…


Thursday, July 19, 2012

THE CLOCK IS TICKING…

Race Against the Clock Tournament – Friday August 10. Matches start at 5pm.

Squash is intense enough. You are battling your opponent, the court conditions, and yourself physically and mentally. No one needs extra pressure. True, you don’t need it, but I’m piling it on anyway. Now, you will be battling the clock as well.

And your time will be short. Very short. Like these sentences. Each match you have will only be a few minutes long. The time may vary from anywhere between 3 minutes to 10 minutes, and it will be your task to accumulate as many points as possible within that limit. Handicaps may be issued. The format for the event will depend on how many registrations I receive, but I do need at least 15 players to run it. Take heed that as is customary, a keg will be provided for your drinking pleasure.

So, there won’t be much point to extending the rallies, wearing your opponent down, relying on superior fitness level. Racquet skills will be playing a more important role here. You will need to shoot and take a few more risks. Be aware, that since the duration of the matches will be brief, you most likely will not be spending too much time on the court overall. But it should be intense, so no relaxing, no time to breathe or scratch yourself, just full-throttle, reckless abandon, no holds barred, lickety-split unrestrained smash-and-dash squash. With a few beers in between…

Up for the challenge? Matches are scheduled to get underway at 5pm, we’ll keep to the 2 downstairs courts, and we should be able to move through the event pretty quickly so I won’t keep you too long. (Again, it will depend on the amount of players.) Registration deadline is Monday, August 6. Tick… tick… tick…

Wednesday, July 18, 2012

TOP SEEDS GET BUSTED

Summer League semi-finals~~

What is it that just about every single league season, the team competing for the title has Patrick Petz on it? And seriously - this is the summer league, where there are no team captains, no draft, and the teams are put together by me, randomly. Luck of the Irish? Is Patrick a true leprechaun?

Patrick’s team – the “Boast-Busters” - put in a solid on-court performance in the semi-final against the top seeded “Gone in 60 Seconds”. Taking into consideration that “Boast-Busters” picked up 2 less bonus points on the night, and had a sub playing for them, they still claimed the victory with a match to spare.

The match that drew the most interest was John Mann versus Brittany Paquette (who was stepping in for the injured Steve Murphy). Trash talking aplenty, poor John was copping the rough end of the pineapple for most of it. He must have been feeling the pressure and wondering how he would be able to show his face in public if he lost, but he stepped up to the task. With authority. And power. Serving as hard as he possibly could – at a pace John White would have been proud of – he stifled Brittany’s ability to control the rallies. How John didn’t yank his shoulder out its socket is a medical miracle but the tactic worked for 2 of the 3 games. Brittany took the third – a point that proved valuable.

After Joe Moran once again proved that experience conquers youth, speed, and fitness with a 3-0 win over Dane Fossee, it came down to the last match of the evening between Brian Schrage and Ted Morris. Back in round 5, Ted beat Brian 2-1; so on paper Brian’s task was a tall one. Cheered on by his teammates including one big leprechaun, Brian scuttled around the court chasing every ball down. It was close, it was exciting. And it was Brian’s day. The 3-0 win secured “Boast-Busters” ticket to the final since with a match left to play they had a 4 point lead.

Continuing their on-court dominance, “Nightmare on Madison Street” took “Robodrops” to town. The two teams managed to get 7 of the 8 matches played, with “Nightmare on Madison Street” winning 6 of them. It was an impressive result all through the line-up, highlighted by strong 3-0 victories by Manny Tancer, Andrew Spohn and Al Iafrate. Dave Simmet and Drew Van Tongeren repeated their round 6 results over their same opponents winning 2-1, while Tom Fabbri revenged his loss to Dave Devine also taking the match 2-1.  Robodrops” lone savior was Justin Winkelman as he beat Todd Baker 2-1.

The final is set – The two teams were scheduled to play each other in the final round if the season, but only one match was played. I will presume that will not be the case next Monday. Predictions? That’s always a dangerous game to play, and I am normally a ‘kiss-of-death’ when I do, but what the hey? I foresee a “Boast-Busters” narrow victory, just to put a little extra pressure on the Patrick Petz leprechaun lucky-streak.

Wednesday, July 11, 2012

TOP FOUR TEAMS CRUISE TO THE FINALS

Summer League round 7 ~~

It really wasn’t much of a contest. The top four teams separated themselves from the bottom four teams back in round three and never looked back. They increased the distance between them every week up until the final round where they were so far ahead that they didn’t need to play it – and in fact two of the teams chose to take the week off.

Nightmare on Madison Street” and “Boast-Busters” were scheduled to play each other, and only one match was played. A couple of bonus points were picked up and one forfeit awarded, but hardly a single squash ball was hit. Not the way to end the season, and certainly something they can’t do next week for the semi final.

Tired in 60 Seconds” jumped from fourth to first in the final two weeks to end up as the league leaders and go into the play-off as the number one seed. It is the first time all season atop of the standings, their timing obviously perfect. “The Snooze Brothers” ended up last, a spot they occupied since round two. They were fourth after round 1, but clearly fell asleep after that. These two teams played each other in the final round and completed 7 of 8 contests. “Tired in 60 Seconds” won the evening 17-15, but it does go to show that even the team that finished last could have been competitive if they played their matches. Here are some of the season statistics:

·         Overall, 76% of the matches were completed. That’s and increase of 13% on last year, and the highest playing percentage the league has ever had. Great job!!
·         Robodrops” played the most with 86% of their matches completed.
·         Surprisingly, “Nightmare on Madison Street”, who finished second, ended up with the second lowest playing percentage with 68%.
·         Lord of the Tins” has the lowest playing percentage with 66%. That’s still higher than last year’s average.
·         Three teams broke the 100 point barrier this season. Before that, only one team in all the past summer league seasons has managed to do that.
·         The last 4 teams on the standings picked up the fewest bonus points. A trend that proves itself every year.
·         5 players collected all possible bonus points.
·         The top team collected the most bonus points. 8 more than the next best.
·         Only 2 players out of the 64 did not pick up any bonus points. That’s impressive.
·         All but 3 matches were played in round 1. And all but 6 matches were completed in rounds 2, 4 and 6.
·         Every player on “Tired in 60 Seconds” scored at least 10 points for their team.
·         Only 1 player on “The Snooze Brothers” scored at least 10 points.
·         Nick Scavone from the “Boast-Busters” scored the most points in the league with 21. And he didn’t play round 7.
·         12 players completed all 7 matches. Only one went through undefeated as well – John Mann from “Tired in 60 Seconds”.
·         The Snooze Brothers” played six matches in round 4. They lost them all 3-0.
·         Framer versus Framer” did the same thing in round 6.
·         The reason “Nightmare on Madison Street” finished second with the second lowest playing percentage was because they lost only one match in the entire season 0-3, five matches 1-2, and won the rest.

On to the semi finals. Players have until Tuesday, July 17 (inclusive) to complete their matches. If “Nightmare on Madison Street” actually turn up and play, they could be the team to beat based on their winning percentage. They took pretty good care of the “Robodrops” in round 5 beating them soundly 20-10. The other match-up was a lot closer. “Boast-Busters” narrowly beat “Tired in 60 Seconds” 19-18 back in round 4. Promises to be interesting.

Tuesday, July 10, 2012

THE HASHIM FILES - PART 4


Hashim is on the right

If ever you thought it wasn’t that important to have the correct technique, then Hashim’s logic should debunk that theory. Of course, just being able to swing the racquet properly won’t make you a great player – there are many other factors that go into it. One of which you can do nothing about – your body. Hashim mentions that having the ‘right body type’ is important. Height included. However, Hashim is only 5 foot 4 inches tall; not exactly the ideal height for a world beater as dominant as he was.

Players today would tower over Hashim. Literally. Current world number one, James Willstrop is listed as 6 foot 4 inches, a full 12 inches taller. It would be difficult to imagine that no matter how fast Hashim was, he could make up one foot of reach. World number 2, Nick Matthew is 6 foot tall. In fact, of the current top ten, 5 of them are at least 6 foot, another 2 of them are listed as 5’ 11”. I don’t know if any one of the 432 players on the world ranking is as short as 5’ 4”. It just proves that Hashim must have had magnificent racquet skills as well as the uncanny ability to be able to read the game. It must have been like watching Yoda – the Jedi Knight – hobble up to the enemy with a walking stick, only to whip out his lightsaber and start zipping every which way at blinding speed, bouncing off the floors and walls, not only thwarting all attacks but using the Force to kill everything in the process, then slowly picking up his walking stick and hobbling away like nothing had happened. Except Hashim wasn’t green. Or had pointy ears.

To see all the blog articles on Hashim, go to: Hashim Kahn 




Tuesday, June 26, 2012

THE INCREDI-BALLS – TAKE 5

Age is no Barrier

Imagine you are a junior. Now imagine you were playing in an age category tournament – the under 13’s for example – and your first round opponent walked on court sporting a three-day growth, was 100 pounds heavier than you, and had a 17 year old girlfriend watching outside. You’d think, “geez, looks a little old to be 12”, wouldn’t you?

Now imagine that the above scenario is not a rarity, but is in fact the norm. Welcome to Pakistani junior squash.

As far-fetched as it sounds, it has become so routine that (reportedly) up 60% of juniors competing in underage events (under 11, 13, 15, 17 and 19) are in fact overage. In one draw of a recent under 19 event it was found that only 4 of the 22 entrants were in fact less than 19 years old.

From what I can gather, Pakistan does not mandate parents to register their newborns. Understandably so when you consider their population, a large number of which live in rural areas, corrupt officials, which would lead to inefficient recording systems and inaccuracies.

One can only presume that if a junior squash player enters a tournament and must provide their age and don’t have a legitimate birth certificate, they are “guessing”. Or lying. And, you may think, if the junior wasn’t sure exactly how old they were, they could probably estimate within a year or two. So if a 15 year old squeezes into the under 15 category, it may be an honest mistake. But that isn’t what’s happening either.

Subtlety, it appears, doesn’t exist in Pakistan. If you are going to lie, may as well go all the way, no? Reports had it that the overage players in the above mentioned example were so visibly older, it was easily detectable. At one event, a player said to be 17 years old was competing in the under 11 draw. Are you kidding me? Unless the lad had some type of growth disease, how could he possibly stand there and claim to be 10? His opponent did complain to the officials, who subsequently ignored him and allowed the 17 year old to play anyway. (I don’t know who won, but I think I can guess.)

No doubt through the sheer weight of complaints, and that Pakistan has become a laughing stock at the international level, the PSF (Pakistan Squash Federation) has put together a committee to start medically examining the players to determine their correct age. How they test them is unclear, but I did read one report that they were using the “armpit” method. I can’t figure out what that is, but it sounds awfully dodgy and old-fashioned to me. (Maybe a reader could explain it to us?)

However, the PSF can implement all the committees and rules it likes. The difficult part is getting all the provincial associations to abide by them. Which it seems they aren’t, and won’t. Only one province is actually conducting tests, but even that looks crooked since the PSF isn’t involved in these tests and won’t - or can’t – recognize them.

Hamza Bokhari (right). This
photo was taken in 2009 when
he won an U/17 event in Asia.
He is listed as being born on
Dec. 31, 1993 which would
have made him 15 at the time.

Not that the PSF can stand there and claim to be all righteous either. They are responsible for sending the Pakistan U-19 Team to the World Junior Championships in July. It is claimed that all four players of that team are overage too. Including Hamza Bokhari. Hamza was considered to be too old for the under 19’s three years ago, but somehow, has turned back the clock and finds himself once again eligible. And looking through his player profile on-line he turned pro in 2006 – which would have made him 12 years old the time. I don’t care how good he was at aged 12, there is no way he was a pro. In fact, after searching through a handful of Pakistan players on-line, I found six of them that all turned pro between the ages of 12 and 15. Remarkable. That’s some junior program they must have.

Naturally, this is all speculation. Innocent until proven guilty, right? It’s impossible to prove anything without authentic birth certificates. And is there even a medical exam that exists that can accurately determine exactly how old a person is? (I am presuming the ‘armpit’ method isn’t it.) These rumors about overage players are nothing new. In fact, I clearly remember it was a topic of discussion when I was a junior over 20 years ago. Nothing was done about it then, and, it appears, nothing seriously is being done about it now.

So what to do? There is really nothing the WSF (World Squash Federation) can do to stop Pakistan in how they conduct their associations. If they want to cheat (yes, I said ‘cheat’), then so be it. Unless the WSF can come up with a method that categorically proves age, they can’t ban them from competing either and simply have to take their word for it. Until that time, I guess the junior squash world will have to put up with being lied to, know that they are being lied to, put on a smiley face and take it.

Thursday, June 21, 2012

Are you as Think as you Smart you are?

Timed-Handicap-Quiz Team Squash Tournament – Wednesday, July 11

Any “Jeopardy” experts out there? In this unique tournament format, squash will not be only thing in which you will need to be successful. I am also going to test just how smart you all are. Playing squash will be the easy part – if you can play non-stop for 20 minutes that is.

I know, I know, 20 minutes does not sound that long. But how many of you have really played that long without stopping? Seriously – no water break, no time-out, no 90 second between game rests – just 20 minutes of continuous rallying. Here is how it will work: You will placed onto one of two teams. Everyone will get one squash match of 20 minutes. You will want to accumulate as many points as possible. In the case where I can’t match up two players of the same standard, I will be awarding handicaps.

Once the squash is finished, each team will have to get together to complete a quiz. Each question is worth a certain amount of points. Questions will be based on your familiarity of the DAC, world squash, and overall general knowledge. Electronic devices will be banned for this portion of the event. Except for the defibrillator – someone may need that. And, if some of your answers are similar to the ones I received when we ran this event a few years ago, that someone may be me.

Given that I survive, I will then add up all the squash points of each team, add on the quiz points, to get your grand total. The winning team will be able to attack the prize table first. I have no idea what the prizes will be, but I will be collecting bits and pieces from around the club that departments wish to unload.

Oh – there will be a keg to attack too. Take note, though, that drinking beer probably does not make you a better squash player, or any smarter. Or sexier – especially sexier. But I am sure some of you may want to debunk that theory… Matches start at 5.30pm and I expect it to go through to around 7.30pm. It of course depends on the amount of entries. We need a minimum 14 players to run it.

Get your name in before July 9. And start watching Alex Trebek. But don’t write your answers on the quiz in the form of a question, I’ll deduct points for that…

Wednesday, June 20, 2012

THE HASHIM FILES - PART 3

Here, Hashim discusses a popular never-ending debate (argument!) among squash enthusiasts – Who is the greatest ever squash player? His answer is somewhat predictable, his logic makes sense, so it’s difficult to argue his point.

However, keep in mind this was written in 1985, so there were many ‘future’ champions yet to establish themselves. Hashim doesn’t even mention Jahangir Khan who was in the middle of his incredible 555 match win-streak at the time and his name is always leading any discussion on this topic. Then Jansher Khan arrived on the scene in 1986 to continue the ‘Khan’ dynasty and dominance of the game. And more recently, the names of Jon Power, Peter Nicol, David Palmer have all made cases for themselves.

It is impossible to compare eras. You can base it on records and titles won, but the sport evolves, the depth of competition increases, there are many factors to take into account. One thing you cannot argue about is that Hashim Khan belongs on that list – and close to the top of it.

Hashim mentions Geoff Hunt on these pages (he spells it ‘Jeff’). I was coached by Geoff Hunt at the Australian Institute of Sport (AIS) back in 1988-1989. Geoff – along with Jonah Barrington – changed the fitness component of the sport in their days of supremacy (mainly the 70’s). They raised the fitness level bar to extraordinary heights and were known to physically (and mentally) destroy their opponents by keeping them on court for as long as possible. Geoff pushed that philosophy onto us - I remember (vividly) having to run 440’s at 6.30am three times a week and do a 6-10 mile run on the other 3 days (Sunday was rest day… gee, thanks!). That’s in addition to the mid-morning and afternoon squash sessions. Needless to say, we were pretty fit – and loved Sundays.





To see all the blog articles on Hashim, go to: http://www.thesquashjoint.blogspot.com/search/label/Hashim%20Khan

Tuesday, June 19, 2012

TOP FOUR PULL AWAY

Summer League round 5~~

It seems the bottom four teams want to make it as easy as possible for the top four to reach the finals. With two rounds to play and 18 points separating 5th placed “Lord of the Tins” from a play-off berth, there is very little pressure being applied. “The Snooze Brothers” will need to probably triple their current score in the remaining weeks to even have a ghost of a chance of making it. Looks like they have truly lived up to their name.

The top two teams play next week and could help each other out in securing those spots if they keep their current trend of turning up and playing matches. It is difficult right now to see any significant changes over the final 2 weeks to the standings, or any of the bottom four teams presenting a serious challenge for the finals. The ‘good’ news, I suppose, is that there is still 3 weeks to get matches in – albeit Independence Day Holiday is in the middle of it and I am sure many will be away on vacation anyway. But you never know, and that is why you play the game and not award winners based on paper predictions.

Tom Bergh
 It was a relatively quiet evening of matches for round 5, so there are not too many matches to write about. Tom Bergh (“Lord of the Tins”) picked up his second win of the season beating James Stuntz (“The Snooze Brothers”) 2-1. James is new to the game and has been on a tough learning curve so far but he is starting to improve – even though he didn’t win the match, this was the first game James has won. I don’t say this to embarrass him – on the contrary. Being new to the league, I wasn’t sure where to place him on the team and consequently I stuck him a position too high. That’s my fault – I congratulate James for sticking with it!

I watched some of the Joe Schaden (“Lord of the Tins”) versus Anil Kathuria (“The Snooze Brothers”) match-up. Joe scored a close 3-0 victory, (improving his season record to 4and 1) but I mention the game for pure entertainment value. It appeared that both players wanted to make winning as hard as possible for themselves as rallies kept going on and on and on, not until a tin or a winner was hit, but until one of them simply couldn’t run anymore and fatigue got the better of them! Opportunities to end the point were politely refused and instead the ball was played to a position just close enough for the other to scramble to and stay in the rally.

So onto round 6. I dearly hope the teams 5th – 8th start making a substantial push and tighten up the standings. At least make the others sweat a little… it is the summer after all!

Wednesday, June 13, 2012

Olympic Squash Doublezzzzzz……

You would think that as the WSF (World Squash Federation) prepare their bid to finally get squash onto the Olympic agenda for the 2020 games, they would put their best foot forward, showcase nothing but the finest the sport can offer. Highlight the athleticism, the unfathomable fitness levels of the players, the world wide diversity, there are so many positives to draw from as the list goes on and on. With their 2020 bid brochure, you can be the judge whether or not they have achieved just that: 2020 Squash Brochure  

Lots of pretty pictures. Even though I don’t like the presentation of the pages where there is only text, it’s not too bad. What you don’t see is any reference to squash doubles. If squash gets accepted into the Olympics, it won’t only be the singles version receiving medals.

I’m not talking about the US doubles version – the hardball version we play at the DAC – I’m talking about the softball doubles version. Yes, the version I bet none of you (DAC members) not only have never played, but have never even seen played. Or even seen a court. Or even know where to find one. Or know the rules. Or – most importantly – care. So why on earth does squash doubles need to be included?

Alas, this red-headed stepchild subspecies of squash exists. And if squash is successful in its bid, it will be Olympic. Since no one is familiar with it, you can click here to view a sample. If you can force yourself to sit through at least the first rally of the clip – which takes 1 minute and 26 seconds – world number 1, James Willstrop (the one in the red shirt), hits the ball only once – 59 seconds in. Otherwise the majority of the exchange is comprised of the two ladies having I-can-hit-it-harder-than-you cross-court practice. It looks like they are warming up. Clearly they are making every attempt to avoid hitting it to either of the fellas – who may as well not even be standing on the court. It is not just dull, it’s embarrassing and absurd – it’s everything squash singles isn’t.

Squash is part of the Commonwealth Games. In 2006 in Melbourne, squash doubles made headlines not because of the quality of the game, but for the sheer boredom of it. Now, this has nothing to do with the players – they are fighting for medals and understandably will do what it takes to win for their country. Even if it means staying on the court for hours. Which they did. The Men’s final was won by England over Australia three games to one. Thankfully there was not a fifth game – the four they played took 3 hours and 17 minutes. Zzzzz... Zzzzz... Zzzzz... I am a squash addict, but I much rather stab myself in the head with a pitchfork than have to watch 200 minutes of squash doubles.

Is this the advertisement the WSF wants to present to the Olympics? Because if it is, why isn’t there any indication (photos) of doubles in the brochure? And if it isn’t, why is it on the agenda?

The doubles court is obviously larger than the singles court. It’s the same length, but wider. A lot wider. In fact it’s over 6 and a half feet wider at 27.63 feet. How they came up with that measurement is beyond me. Even converting it to metric, its 8.42 meters… seems an awfully random number.  And the tin is lower. The tin of a normal sized singles squash court for amateurs is 19 inches high, of the clip above, the tin is 17 inches high. Now, in order to make the doubles game more ‘exciting’, the WSF just announced it will lower the tin to 13 inches. Improvement? Sure, I suppose. It couldn’t be worse. Hopefully it will make the matches shorter and prevent anyone crazy enough to actually watch it from slipping into a catatonic state. But in reality, the entire idea of including doubles on the Olympic program should be scrapped. I believe it hurts squash’s chances of being accepted rather than helps.

So why is it in the discussion in the first place? There is no international doubles ranking. Nor is there a doubles tour. Hence, the players competing are hardly doubles ‘specialists’. The only time these players actually play doubles is during special competitions such as the Commonwealth Games. It seems to be there solely for the purpose to award more medals. Is it an Olympic requirement (in which case, squash has no choice but to shoot itself in the foot), or, is it because the WSF feels they need to be just like tennis, badminton and table tennis where they do have legitimate doubles categories? It’s not as if the players have dedicated years of their life training and perfecting their craft for the doubles court.

Squash should be Olympic. There is no doubt about that. But it should be squash singles. And only singles. Nick Matthew, James Willstrop, Ramy Ashour, Greg Gaultier (amongst others) – these guys are the heart and soul of what our phenomenal sport is all about. It’s a waste of time forcing them to play doubles. WSF should pour 100% of their efforts into the singles game, sell to the Olympic Committee the reasons squash is the greatest of all the sports. You cannot possibly do that with doubles in the mix.

The Olympic Committee will make their decision on which sport to include into to 2020 Games in September 2013.

Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Who Ya Gonna Call? BOAST-BUSTERS!

Summer League round 4~~

You just know I couldn’t resist taking the opportunity and using this cheesy title for the article! “Boast-Busters” had the best night out of all the teams picking up 18 points – 5 more than the next best “Tired in 60 Seconds” and “Framer versus Framer” – and have now solidified themselves atop of the standings. With only 3 rounds to go before the finals start, they are in excellent shape.

And so is the team ranked 2nd. “Robodrops” are only 3 points back of the league leaders. The 3rd and 4th ranked teams also enjoy a little cushion but it isn’t as comfortable. Just 9 points separate them from the chasing pack, which is important considering only the top 4 teams will advance to the play-offs, but 9 points translates into 3 wins if the other teams can start to make up some matches. “The Snooze Brothers” have fallen asleep on the job and have dropped way behind averaging less than 7 points per round. With only a total of 9 bonus points so far, it is not difficult to see why. 

A young and spightly Joe Moran!

With sixteen matches played last night, there was plenty of close contests. Dave Devine (“Robodrops”) succeeded in overcoming the relentless lob / drop attack of Jerry Rock (“Lord of the Tins”) 2-1; Joey Gaylord (“Framer versus Framer”) had the narrowest 3-0 win of the round over Bill Seymour (“Not So Great Expectations”) 15-14, 15-14, 15-7; Sante Fratarcangeli (“Tired in 60 Seconds”) knocked off Patrick Petz (“Boast-Busters”) 2-1; and Joe Moran (“Boast-Busters”) was surprised that his experience actually does count for something after beating Dane Fossee (“Tired in 60 Seconds”) who is according to Joe over 100 years his junior (give-or-take!) 2-1. Dane was not even born when Joe had started playing squash. (Or come to think of it, when I started playing either… *sigh*)

As mentioned above, there are only 3 rounds to play before the play-offs. You do, however, have 4 weeks to play them in since there isn’t anything scheduled for July 2 – the Monday before Independence Day. So, the deadline to have your results to me is July 10 inclusive. On the morning of July 11 – a Wednesday – I will be sending out the schedule for the semi-finals which will be on July 16. No excuses.

Wednesday, June 6, 2012

THE HASHIM FILES - PART 2

That's Hashim on the right.
I don't know who the fellow on the left is.
Picking up where we left off, Hashim continues with his summary of his life to date. (That date being 27 years ago!) For those who are wondering, Hashim is still alive and kicking, albeit at 96 years old I doubt he graces the court very often.

Detroit is mentioned in these pages and I’m sure some of our long-term members remember the days when Hashim ruled the Motor City. He now resides in Denver, where I briefly met him back in 1996 (I think) during a PSA tournament at the Denver Athletic Club. Hashim was 80 years old and was playing a hardball doubles event with a partner older than he was. It was my first ever exposure to hardball doubles – I found it somewhat bemusing (the game, not Hashim!). From what I remember, even though he couldn't cover the court very quickly, he appeared to have extra sensory perception and it was as if he knew exactly where the next ball was going to be played. Uncanny anticipation. And a clean hitter. I don’t know if he won or not, but after watching for the ten minutes or so that I did, I can't imagaine he lost.






To see all the blog articles on Hashim, go to: Hashim Khan