Wednesday, February 26, 2020

SQUASH V TENNIS


It’s an old argument. And it depends on which side of the net (or glass) you are on. Which sport is more difficult? Squash or Tennis?

A little background here: I am a teaching squash pro. I first hit a squash ball in 1976 (yes, wooden racquets!), I have played PSA, and have been coaching for over 30 years internationally. To say that I am bias towards squash would be an understatement and if I was asked this question 6-7 years ago my answer would have been an immediate and curt “Squash of course! What a stupid question!” with a smirk on my face of an underlying sense of snarkiness at the idiocy of the enquiry.

But now I am of a much transformed opinion. A little more (recent) background…: For the past number of years, I have been more immersed into the very different world of tennis. My daughter has been playing tennis for about 8 years now and is currently highly ranked nationally in her age group, spends a number of weeks a year in Orlando at the national training center, trains 5-6 days a week, and at home our lives basically revolve her tennis training and tournament schedule (and school of course!).

My knowledge of tennis before my daughter started taking it seriously was limited at best, and I was never inclined to sit and watch professional tennis on television. I thought of it as very one dimensional – hit the ball as hard as you can and get it past your opponent – and consequently boring to watch. Now, after watching and experiencing many tennis tournaments and observing many tennis lessons and practices, I absolutely do not consider myself an expert by any means, but I look at tennis with very different eyes and outlook. My admiration for the sport has been unquestionably enhanced, as is my understanding of just how difficult tennis really is.

Tarek Momen
But the question of “difficulty” is rather a broad, ill-defined parameter. What exactly are you measuring when you think about difficulty? For us squash players, our minds immediately jump to the fitness requirements. The physical side of each sport. And under this category, squash is indisputably harder. I am not sure anyone who knows both sports well could possibly argue this point. There was an article written in April 2018 (Article can be read here). Summarizing the piece, they measured squash professional Tarek Momen during a 97 minute epic 5-game battle. The stats included the distance he ran, time (percentage) the ball was in play, heart rate, rest times between points, and the amount of times he hit the ball and compared it to a 2017 Rafael Nadal match from Wimbledon where he lost in 5 sets in 288 minutes (almost 5 hours!). The differences are eye-popping… although to a squash professional not overly surprising. It could not be any more convincing that squash is far superior when it comes to physical exertion.

So, Squash – 1. Tennis – 0.

But… fitness is not the only determining factor when talking about how difficult a sport is. There are three other major measuring sticks that in my mind need to be taken into consideration as well.

Technical. Which technique is harder to learn? The squash swing I find for beginners can be rather awkward to initially get right. I think mainly because even though the technique is logical - it’s easy to understand why we swing a racquet the way we do - it’s not a natural movement. Generally speaking we hit the squash ball from side on, our contact point is next to our bodies with an open racquet face, but our natural instincts are to chase the ball and get behind it. So the footwork and swing can take a while to get comfortable with especially since a squash ball doesn’t bounce very much compared to a tennis ball. As a player improves, the speed of the game gets faster, and the swing and footwork adapts. Techniques become more varied based on the situation. That being said, even though squash technique does differ between certain shots (a straight drive (or rail) is not the same as a defensive cross-court lob for example) and there is more than one way to hit a drop shot as well, the basic variations are not all that severe and once you master the general swing, the rest is not so much of a stretch.

Rafa Nadal
The tennis swing is a different animal. Top spin is a total enigma to me, but it does appear to be easier – and more natural - to initially figure out for beginners. Contact point is generally in front of the body which is easier to grasp as well. However, tennis has multiple techniques that are vastly different to one another. Firstly, the grip changes based on backhand / forehand / serve / volley. The tennis serve technique must be the hardest of all racquet sports skills to acquire affectively, slicing is another aptitude that is easy for squash players, but can be a challenge for tennis players. Net volley, swinging volley, overhead volley, volley drop… all different. Clay surface technique requires more spin than hard court. Outdoor factors can affect the player’s swing as well – wind can be very tough to deal with for example. And overall, and I think this is one of the most telling elements, it is harder to keep the ball in play in tennis. Rallies simply do not go on as long? Why? It’s technically harder to do so. The amount of ‘unforced errors’ in a pro tennis match are infinitely greater. On technique, I really believe tennis has the edge here.

Squash – 1. Tennis -1.

Tactical. The torturous physical brutality of squash is amplified due to the incredibly problematic and grueling task of getting one’s opponent out of position. The tactic at a beginner level is dreadfully easy – simply hit the ball in the back corner. Of course, once a player has learned to retrieve the ball out of the corner effectively, squash suddenly takes on an abusive form of self-mutilation. It becomes considerably more strenuous to win rallies. Tactics at pro level are quite subtle. One shot winners are not that common. Ripping a ball down the wall for a ‘sudden’ winner is rare at best. Nicks are spectacular but come with high risk and not a lot of players are willing to do that regularly. Working your opponent out of position is a highly challenging task and takes a string of shots to achieve, only to have that advantage nullified with a decent defensive lob to reset the rally… and off you go again. A loose shot is punished – players don’t hit unforced errors that easily, so tactically you have to remain accurate while your heart is pumping at 180+ beats per minute.

This is where I find tennis a little more basic. There is no back wall – or side wall – to work your angles. Once the ball is past you, the rally is over 90%+ of the time. One may argue it makes tennis tougher tactically, but I disagree. One shot winners present themselves often and obviously are more common in tennis – in fact, you only need a huge serve to win in some cases nailing ace after ace. Also, because the technique is harder, players hit a lot more mistakes and often the only tactic one needs in tennis is to simply keep the ball in play. Upsets are more frequent, how often does a very low ranked player beat a top ten ranked? I figure if that can happen, then the tactic can’t be that complex. In squash, anyone outside the top 20 would rarely beat a top 10.

Considering the ‘angle’ factor in squash adds another dimension, plus squash utilizes the front corners so often as compared to tennis where drop-shots are sporadic at best. Squash takes this one.

Squash – 2. Tennis -1

Mental. I will probably be raked over the coals for this, but after all I have ‘analyzed’ these past years, tennis is by far the mentally tougher sport. A huge reason for this: the scoring system. Tennis is broken up into small pieces. A player is never more than 4 rallies away from being game point down. That alone increases the pressure on every rally you play, every shot you hit, every double fault, every ball you hit out or into the net, or – every winner you hit. There is a constant burden on the players with these mini-dramas built within every game and set. Constantly having to save game points. A short mental lapse in a game will cost you. Coming back from 0-40 is common. Squash on the other hand certainly has its own mental challenges due to the pure energy exertion required of the sport, and we consider mental toughness as basically pushing through the physical pain we experience, but the game pressure on a player only really builds when both players are close to the end of the game. There are no persistent situations where a player is always just 4 points from losing a game. Coming back from 0-10… errr never.

Furthermore, the length of a tennis match can take hours. Keeping the mind focused for that long, often under extreme weather conditions (Aussie Open heat for example… or even constant breaks in the match due to rain in Wimbledon) is simply more taxing on the brain. More money involved (yes, that one hurts squash players to hear, but when the difference of winning and losing is literally millions of dollars, then it is added pressure) larger and louder crowds, more media scrutiny… There is increased pressure coming from more outside influences. It piles on. A vast percentage of tennis professionals have mental coaches for this exact reason – dealing with all these stresses. Squash has these demands as well to some extent – but nowhere near to the same levels - I wonder how many squash professionals employ mental coaches?

End score: Squash – 2. Tennis – 2

A tie? Both sports are equally demanding based on my four criteria. However, that being said, I would also suggest (much to the chagrin of my fellow squash players) that tennis is actually tougher to get to the top with. Why? Numbers. There are simply more tennis players in the world. Greater competition means it’s harder to stand out and harder to win. 



Obviously, this is one man’s opinion. I am sure there are many of you out there that have more experience in both sports that would counter my arguments. Have at it. But I do have to say that tennis is not the straightforward sport I once thought it was and I have grown to appreciate the complexities and challenges behind it. Both sports are incredibly tough in their own way. Comparing apples to oranges is always a call for disagreements, just like arguing… who was the greatest squash player of all time? Jansher? Jahangir? Hashim? Heather McKay? I welcome all your thoughts.

Thursday, February 20, 2020

SIXTH SPOT UP FOR GRABS


Boasters League round 7~~

The Boasters League finals are looming. Depending on where you are, the “looming” could mean dark, ominous clouds threatening to end your season rather abruptly and for a couple of the teams, it has already started raining, or, it could mean you see rainbows and unicorns prancing around the greener pastures in anticipation of a successful play-off run.

Only six teams will advance to the chance of Boasters glory and right now, all of the bottom 4 teams have a decent chance of claiming that last spot. Nine points separate 6th from 9th. Wardogs – as predicted this week with the bye – endured the biggest loss picking up just 6 points and now find themselves on the brink of elimination. From that group, Nick at Night out did themselves and scored a season’s personal best 32 points this week, again flip-flopping with Over Served and handing them once again the distasteful position of being last.

Mongoose continue on their merry way with another 30 points this week (15 of which were bonus points), although it was good for only 4th best this week, they still hold a commanding 28 point league over Winky-Dinks. The only way to stop Mongoose it seems is for them to sit out, which they do next week, but I would be surprised if they lose their top billing. Not that it matters too much, the top two teams in the play-offs receive the first round bye anyway, and the odds of Mongoose dropping to third place in the next 2 weeks is slim to none.

Activity was at a fairly decent level last night. I don’t usually get players insisting about getting into the blog report – especially after a loss – but Rich Stimson (Vivio’s) requested I make a special mention of his almost win over Han Peng (Nick at Night). Rich won the first, held what he thought was an unassailable lead in the second (we all know that that doesn’t exist!) before it all came tumbling down as Han did what he does best – run. Rich is no stranger to the hustle either, but he was no match for Han this evening and the 2-1 comeback win put a smile on Han’s face and a beer straight into Rich’s hand.

JB Peabody (Butter Nutz) pulled out his secret weapon with the lobster shorts to take on Mike Rock (Mongoose) but the mojo is wearing off. Mike was able to resist the power of the pants and took the 2-1 win. Curt Pedersen (Over Served) recorded his first win of the second half with a tough 2-1 win over Schuyler Hamill (Foss Nation), handing Schuyler his first loss. Funny how that works out. And Jason Currie (Mongoose) managed to snag a game and put a little scare into Jed Elley (Butter Nutz) before going down 2-1.



We are at the business end of the league. Two rounds to go, two weeks to get matches in (deadline is March 5) and we lose 2 courts on March 5 as well. The finals will be played with a tight squeeze to be sure – something we will simply have to deal with and work around. Will one of the bottom four teams finally make a push? Will JB Peabody finally retire the lobster pants and maybe go more in the direction of Lori McColl’s leather pair? (… oh wait, maybe that’s a bad idea…) Did I remember to close the garage when I left the house this morning? Hmmmm… life is full of contemplations …

Search This Blog