Friday, March 16, 2018
MONGOOSE EYEBALLING THE REPEAT
I really enjoy controversy-free league nights. Especially
when it’s the semifinals. I can calmly drive home, sing along in the car to my
1980’s rock music silently wishing I still had my long hair, relax in front of
the idiot box for a while and savor my Ben and Jerry’s ice-cream dessert that
little bit more. Ahhhh… peace….
By the time I got into work the following morning, all but 1
match had been completed (that’s 33 of 34!) and the winning teams had already
been decided. No mess, no fuss, the score board spoke for itself, there wasn’t
anything anyone could complain about.
I hope I haven’t spoken too soon!
Vivio’s v Mongoose
Considering both teams required 2 subs for this match-up,
there was no potential bonus point advantage to speak of here. However, as has
been Mongoose’s M.O. this season,
their captain Paul Huth was on the
warpath ready to dish out whatever horrible punishment he could conjure up to
any of his remaining players that didn’t turn up. And it must have been
something utterly despicable as all 15
of them made the effort. That endeavor paid off as Vivio’s only saw 12 of their players make a showing. At this stage
of the season, every point is important.
We start off with one of the best matches of not only the
evening, but arguably the season including perhaps the best rally of the year as well. Kevin Thomas (Vivio’s) and Tom Fabbri
had a unimpressive first game as Tom was still finding his way, but the next
two games was when the excitement was at its maximum level. Literally nothing
between them, at 14-all in the second game, Tom was in clear control of the
rally. There was nothing Kevin could do but try to survive. Each desperate
retrieval putting him in even more trouble. Bring out the dive! Not one – but
two! Full body, head first, royal blue cape flying high behind him. And still
the rally continued, until Tom… hit the tin. The yelp of despair resonated
through the fitness room, but Tom was able to regain his senses after the two
minute rest and kept the pressure up for the third and final game. Another down
to the wire contest, Tom had the 14-13 lead, Kevin once again forced to do
anything and everything just to stay in the hunt. And déjà vu all over again. (Minus
the super-hero moves.) Kevin’s brick-wall method saved his skin anew, Tom
clipping the top of the tin at the worst possible time. The 3-0 result was
Kevin’s, his sigh of relief could be heard in the carpark.
More noticeable results were chalked up through the evening,
each team picking up some solid wins. Paul
Huth (Mongoose) pulled one out of the hat when it counted the most with his
first win over Paul Van Tol in 4
tries and since May of 2017. Mike
Hanchett (Vivio’s) reserved his
round 3 loss to Andrew Peleman with
a 2-1 victory here, and Mike Petix (Mongoose) continues his hoodoo voodoo
powers over Rich Stimson winning 2-1
and keeping his perfect record against the Vivio’s
captain intact.
Through the night, Mongoose
kept its nose in front. That lead fluctuated from as high as 14 points early on
to as low as 6 later on in the evening. The nail in the coffin for Vivio’s came when most were already out
of the building (and I was probably drooling over my ice-cream spoon) when Mongoose’s David DeCew and Ian Edwards
both completed 3-0 wins. Mongoose advance
by ten points - 44-34.
Butter Nutz v Over
Served
This was closer. Although for most of the night it did
appear as if Butter Nutz didn’t have
much of a shot. They fell behind early, and by a significant margin. Five of
the matches were played before the scheduled Wednesday and Over Served had won four of them – all 3-0. So before the semifinal
officially got underway, Butter Nutz were
already losing 13 to 2.
The bonus point count wasn’t much of a factor for this
match-up and I was a little surprised more of effort wasn’t made by both teams.
Over Served picked up just 11, and Butter Nutz 12. Butter Nutz could have changed the outcome had more turned up.
As the evening wore on, Over
Served was increasing their lead.
The early results were not looking good for Butter Nutz as the scores came in. A couple more 3-0 losses and it
was potentially turning into a total wipeout.
Is was up to Butter
Nutz captain JC Tibbitts to lead
by example and try to stop the rot against Jeff
Gembis. Not an easy task as Jeff has beaten JC the last two times they
played. These two are not too dissimilar with their styles, both can pound
strong length, but both can also falter when it comes to ‘ending’ the rallies
with their short game. Splitting games one and two, the third was no easy path
for either player. However, JC started to exploit the front corners more often
with clever use of the boast and often leaving Jeff a little stranded. It was
catch-up time for Jeff and he did manage to scrape a few points back but it
wasn’t enough. JC took the 2-1 and hopefully some of them momentum back for his
team.
John Perkins (Over Served), though, was having none
of it. Playing Brendan Fossee, it
must have been in the back of his mind that Brendan took him to task in round 1
with a 3-0 drubbing, and he was unwilling to re-experience it. Admittedly, not
the cleanest of matches between the two, not a particularly tight–ball
performance, both players hit their fair share of loose shots and unforced
errors. But, if we only would win when we played really well, we wouldn’t win
very often, right? Have to hustle. And John and
Brendan know how to do that. Kudos to both players here for also playing
through a lot of interference, (although at times I do think a ‘let’ call would
have been in everybody’s interest!). It doesn’t have to be pretty, it just have
to be more effective than your opponents, and John avenged his early season
loss here with a 2-1 win! Momentum back to Over
Served? Not so fast.
Cue the comeback. Well, almost
the comeback. When the next – and last - five results came in, Butter Nutz was ringing the bell every
time. And – believe it or not – after all 17 results had been completed, Butter Nutz had won more overall matches than Over Served. But, their early 3-0
losses came back to haunt them. Over
Served survived the last minute onslaught to get away with a 39-35 victory!
The final is set! Over
Served v Mongoose. It wasn’t
long ago that these two squared off – just 2 weeks ago in round 9 – and 13 of
the 17 matches were done… Mongoose
came out just on top 33-30. Looking at the individual match-ups, it does look
too close to call and to be honest, going by my history if I do nominate my ‘favorite’
it’s a guaranteed jinx move. Keep in mind, Mongoose
require 2 subs and that will affect their potential bonus point maximum. Over Served can take advantage, clearly
every point will be crucial.
Comments (15)

Sort by: Date Rating Last Activity
Loading comments...
Comments by IntenseDebate
Posting anonymously.
Labels:
Boasters
Fred Metry · 273 weeks ago
Marc Lakin · 264 weeks ago
Todd · 264 weeks ago
BBaker · 264 weeks ago
Thanks for the lesson guys!!
B
Ps...I wish I could return a serve!!!
Jedco · 237 weeks ago
This is Jed, If I had one question for MOHAMED EL SHORBAGY, it would be "Obviously you have heard of the 2016 Blue Chips, they may have been a bit of a Shooting star (rising to extreme glory quick and then calling it a career) if you will, but do you think they were the greatest doubles duo ever formed?"
Ryan here, if I had a follow up question to Jed's, it would be "I know that you are not a doubles player, but If given a 5 point lead in each game, could you and your brother, Marwan have taken 2 games off of The Blue Chips at their peak in 2016?"
Thanks for your time,
JEDCO
Paul Gormley · 221 weeks ago
MATTHEW TURNBULL · 187 weeks ago
Congratulations to the Legs Miserable teammates for a great season. Cheers!
Massimo Squillace · 181 weeks ago
MOHAMED EL SHORBAGY · 172 weeks ago
I never heard of the Blue Chips. I'm not sure why some random, unknown 2016 doubles team is relevant to the topic of DAC Boasters.
Thank you for your message.
P.S. JEDCO is #1
George Haggarty · 163 weeks ago
Kudos to you for another great blog and another fine tournament. Thanks to you and all the DAC staff for your hard work to make this event a success!
George
Todd S · 158 weeks ago
aucljewellery 32p · 117 weeks ago
Arav Barve · 109 weeks ago
I also appreciate the fact that they use sustainable materials in their products, which is a big plus in my book. It's always great to see companies taking steps towards reducing their environmental impact.
Overall, I would definitely recommend Shreeji Woodcraft to anyone looking for high-quality squash court flooring in India. Keep up the great work!
monalisanayak 1p · 32 weeks ago
If you want to know about Concrete for Foundation then you can click here.
Thanks for sharing.